[Solutions Showcase] 중단 없는 기업용 고성능 서비스가 필요하다면, Fujitsu Enterprise Postgres

오늘도 클라우드에 쉼없이 쌓여가는 DB는 결국 피할 수 없는 비용이 됩니다.

데이터베이스 유지비용을 획기적으로 줄일 수 있는 FEB 솔루션을 만나보세요. 오직 네이버 클라우드 플랫폼에서만 만날 수 있는 특별 프로모션도 소개해드립니다.

빠른 정보 확인을 위한 time stamp!
0:12 인트로
01:56 고객 요구사항의 변화
04:49 Fujitsu Enterprise Postgres(FEP)란?
06:48 FEP 차별화된 기능
14:28 FEP 아키텍처
16:11 FEP 도입사례
22:40 FEP on NAVER Cloud Platform
24:05 FAQ

Fujitsu Enterprise Postgres 자세히 보기
https://www.ncloud.com/marketplace/fujitsu

네이버 클라우드 플랫폼 더 알아보기
https://www.ncloud.com

네이버 클라우드 플랫폼 교육 포털
https://edu.ncloud.com 에서 무료 온라인 교육, 정기 교육 일정, 기술 자격증 정보를 확인해 보세요.

#NAVERCLOUD #네이버클라우드

"SEK2007"의 현장 속으로 시리즈(후지쯔)

에너지 저장의 신기술, 리튬2차전지 [SEK2007]
@1001optics : 이민하씨 이때는 애기네요 ㅋㅋ

Fujitsu Technology and Service Vision 2023

Short overview of Fujitsu Technology and Service Vision for 2023. Discover how sustainability can be integrated into business and drive value, different futures that the evolution of technologies will drive and how these can help you to transform your business towards a regenerative society.
@RossPeterson06 : I disagree with the premise: "We need to build a radically different society."
That's a huge claim with a high burden of proof that needs to be met (and hasn't in my mind).

What is being implied when they say that "we need to build a radically different society"?
Doesn't it imply, at the very least, reform of the existing society?
Shouldn't Fujitsu's vision be to serve the societies (governments, institutions, businesses) that exist and try to find solutions to their problems?

And which society is being referred to exactly?
Fujitsu is a global, transnational corporation, so is it some sort of global society we're referring to?

With this statement alone, it seems to me that Fujitsu is or is dangerously close to overstepping its bounds as a business / corporation
and is positioning itself as a political actor—possibly in violation of the sovereignty of nations and their peoples.

The use of the phrase "sustainability transformation" also suggests an intent to re/trans-form society.
But who has decided this and on what authority? Through elected representatives?

Why should sustainability be the goal of society?
Wouldn't growth be a better goal so that we expand our capacity to address large scale problems (such as environmental problems)?

I am profoundly concerned about the vision being advanced here. This vision, while being put forward with good intentions, appears to me to be naïve, ill-considered, and even dangerous for society.

I think the assumptions / presuppositions of this vision need to be examined and made explicit for transparency, discussion, and—I would hope—reconsideration.

...